Practice Constitutional Amendments MCQs for FPSC Auditor / Junior Auditor (BS-14) Pakistan Affairs — topic-wise sets with solved answers.
Q1. A student argues that an ordinary Act of Parliament can rename a province and change its representation formula without touching the higher amendment procedure. Under the 1973 Constitution, which rule blocks that shortcut?
Answer: A constitutional amendment must follow the special procedure in Article 239 rather than a normal statute
Explanation: Article 239 of the 1973 Constitution prescribes a special amendment procedure requiring a two-thirds majority in both houses of Parliament, and in some cases provincial assembly consent, making constitutional changes far more demanding than ordinary legislation. An ordinary Act of Parliament cannot override this entrenched procedure to alter fundamental constitutional arrangements like provincial boundaries.
Q2. In 1997 the Prime Minister moved to stop the President from dissolving the National Assembly under the power later associated with repeated political crises. Which amendment best matches that move?
Answer: The Thirteenth Amendment Act 1997
Explanation: The Thirteenth Amendment of 1997 removed the President's discretionary power to dissolve the National Assembly under Article 58(2)(b), a power that had been used repeatedly to dismiss elected governments.
Q3. A timeline card lists “restored presidential power to dissolve the National Assembly” as a headline change of the early 2000s. Which amendment is the usual reference in textbooks?
Answer: The Seventeenth Amendment Act 2003
Explanation: The Seventeenth Amendment Act of 2003, passed during General Pervez Musharraf's government, granted the President sweeping powers including the authority to dissolve the National Assembly under Article 58(2)(b).
Q4. A teacher marks a map task “FATA administrative merger into a province” and asks which numbered reform package you should cite in an exam note. Which amendment is the standard answer?
Answer: The Twenty-Fifth Amendment Act 2018
Explanation: The Twenty-Fifth Constitutional Amendment, passed in May 2018, merged the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, ending the FATA's separate administrative status that dated to the colonial era. This brought tribal belt residents under the jurisdiction of the provincial government, courts, and legislature for the first time.
Q5. Two classmates compare “trimming the Concurrent Legislative List to shift law-making towards provinces” with “creating military courts for a time-bound anti-terror window.” Which pairing is accurate?
Answer: Concurrent List reform is tied to the Eighteenth Amendment while special military courts are tied to the Twenty-First Amendment
Explanation: The Eighteenth Amendment (2010) abolished the Concurrent Legislative List, transferring those subjects to provincial jurisdiction, while the Twenty-First Amendment (2015) created special military courts for a defined two-year window to try terrorism-related cases. These two amendments represent distinct phases of constitutional reform - one driven by devolution goals, the other by security imperatives.
Loading...