Logical Problems MCQs set 2 for AKU Entry Test Logical Reasoning — 20 solved questions.
Q1. All mammals have lungs. Whales are mammals. Which conclusion logically follows?
Answer: All whales have lungs.
Explanation: Syllogism: All A are B. All C are A. Therefore, All C are B. Option B introduces irrelevant gills.
Q2. If a student studies, they pass the exam. Maria passed the exam. Which conclusion is valid?
Answer: Maria studied.
Explanation: Affirming the consequent is invalid. Maria could have passed via other means.
Q3. All birds have feathers. Penguins are birds. Which statement is logically sound?
Answer: Penguins have feathers.
Explanation: Direct syllogism applies. Penguins have feathers is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q4. If it snows, the roads are closed. The roads are closed. What can be concluded?
Answer: Roads are sometimes closed.
Explanation: Closing roads could have other causes. Affirming the consequent (A) is invalid.
Q5. All squares are rectangles. All rectangles have four sides. What must be true?
Answer: All squares have four sides.
Explanation: Transitive logic applies. All squares have four sides is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q6. Either X is true or Y is false. X is false. What must be true?
Answer: Y is false.
Explanation: Disjunctive syllogism: If ¬X, then Y must be false. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q7. No reptiles are mammals. Some snakes are reptiles. What follows?
Answer: Some snakes are not mammals.
Explanation: Logical contrapositive applies. Some snakes are not mammals is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q8. If a plant is a cactus, it needs little water. The rose needs little water. Conclusion?
Answer: Cacti may have other traits.
Explanation: Affirming the consequent invalid. Cacti could share traits with non-cacti. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q9. All doctors are professionals. Some professionals are teachers. What is valid?
Answer: Some doctors are teachers.
Explanation: Overlap between sets is possible. Some doctors are teachers is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q10. If a polygon is regular, all sides are equal. The hexagon has unequal sides. Conclusion?
Answer: The hexagon is irregular.
Explanation: Contrapositive logic: ¬Q → ¬P. The hexagon is irregular is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q11. Some students are athletes. All athletes are disciplined. What must be true?
Answer: Some students are disciplined.
Explanation: Transitive overlap applies. Some students are disciplined is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q12. If a number is even, it is divisible by 2. 14 is divisible by 2. Conclusion?
Answer: 14 is even.
Explanation: Valid contrapositive logic. 14 is even is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q13. All metals conduct electricity. Gold is a metal. What is valid?
Answer: Gold conducts electricity.
Explanation: Direct syllogism applies. Gold conducts electricity is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q14. If it is a weekday, the library is open. The library is closed. Conclusion?
Answer: It is a weekend.
Explanation: Valid contrapositive. It is a weekend is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q15. All mammals have hearts. Whales have hearts. Valid conclusion?
Answer: Whales are mammals.
Explanation: Affirms transitive property. Whales are mammals is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q16. Either Ali or Usman is telling the truth. Ali is lying. What follows?
Answer: Usman is truthful.
Explanation: Disjunctive syllogism applies. Usman is truthful is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q17. All prime numbers >2 are odd. 17 is prime. What can be concluded?
Answer: 17 is odd.
Explanation: Direct deduction from premises. 17 is odd is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q18. If a solution is acidic, it has pH <7. The juice has pH 3. Conclusion?
Answer: The juice is acidic.
Explanation: Direct conditional application. The juice is acidic is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q19. No birds are reptiles. All parrots are birds. Valid conclusion?
Answer: No parrots are reptiles.
Explanation: Transitive exclusion applies. No parrots are reptiles is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.
Q20. If it is sunny, we play cricket. We did not play cricket. Conclusion?
Answer: It was not sunny.
Explanation: Valid contrapositive. It was not sunny is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.