The trainee assumed silence meant rejection, unaware that the panel debated scoring criteria before releasing shortlists the next dawn. Which inference about the trainee is most justified?
Q1. The trainee assumed silence meant rejection, unaware that the panel debated scoring criteria before releasing shortlists the next dawn. Which inference about the trainee is most justified?
Answer: The trainee misread a delayed procedural step as personal failure
Explanation: The passage reveals that silence was a normal procedural delay (panel deliberating), not a rejection signal; the trainee therefore misread a routine step as personal failure.