If a car is out of fuel, it stalls. The car stalled. What conclusion is valid?
Q1. If a car is out of fuel, it stalls. The car stalled. What conclusion is valid?
Answer: It ran out of fuel.
Explanation: Affirming the consequent is invalid. It ran out of fuel is correct because it matches what the question requires. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.