mdcat logical reasoning MCQ #897

A study claims 'All patients with X have Y symptoms'. A doctor observes Y symptoms in a patient. What can be concluded?

mdcat logical reasoning MCQ #897

  1. Question 1

    Q1. A study claims 'All patients with X have Y symptoms'. A doctor observes Y symptoms in a patient. What can be concluded?

    • A) The patient has X
    • B) The patient lacks X
    • C) Y symptoms imply X
    • D) Y symptoms may occur without X

    Answer: Y symptoms may occur without X

    Explanation: D acknowledges converse fallacy. A assumes false equivalence. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.