Which statement invalidates the argument: 'If it rains, the ground gets wet. The ground is wet, therefore it rained.'?
Q1. Which statement invalidates the argument: 'If it rains, the ground gets wet. The ground is wet, therefore it rained.'?
Answer: The ground can be wet without rain
Explanation: A shows converse fallacy. C repeats the invalid assumption. USAT, HAT and MDCAT analytical sections repeat this pattern.